------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org  2005-05-17 12:30 
-------
(In reply to comment #8)
> - yes, however as the loigical extention of:
>    "a null reference is undefined" => "may trap" => "will trap"
>    is simply wrong, and is not justifyable; such an optimization
>    is target specific, as it depends on "will trap" target semantics.

Right. However, the logic here is simply "a null pointer dereference is
undefined" => "if you still do it, your code may behave however gcc feels
like", which is backed by the C standard. So this is invalid.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479

Reply via email to