------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org 2005-05-17 12:30
-------
(In reply to comment #8)
> - yes, however as the loigical extention of:
> "a null reference is undefined" => "may trap" => "will trap"
> is simply wrong, and is not justifyable; such an optimization
> is target specific, as it depends on "will trap" target semantics.
Right. However, the logic here is simply "a null pointer dereference is
undefined" => "if you still do it, your code may behave however gcc feels
like", which is backed by the C standard. So this is invalid.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479
