------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org  2005-06-23 
14:44 -------
Subject: Bug 19317

CVSROOT:        /cvs/gcc
Module name:    gcc
Changes by:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]       2005-06-23 14:44:21

Modified files:
        gcc            : ChangeLog tree.h calls.c tree-inline.c 
                         tree-pretty-print.c gimplify.c tree-nrv.c 
                         tree-pass.h tree-optimize.c 
        gcc/cp         : ChangeLog semantics.c 
Added files:
        gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt: nrv9.C 

Log message:
        PR c++/19317
        Leave the return slot target in the MODIFY_EXPR rather than making
        it an argument, but only use it if the CALL_EXPR has a flag set.
        * tree.h (CALL_EXPR_HAS_RETURN_SLOT_ADDR): Rename to
        CALL_EXPR_RETURN_SLOT_OPT.
        * calls.c (expand_call): Adjust.
        * tree-inline.c (expand_call_inline): Adjust.
        * tree-pretty-print.c (dump_generic_node): Adjust.
        
        And set the flag as appropriate.
        * gimplify.c (gimplify_modify_expr_rhs): Set
        CALL_EXPR_HAS_RETURN_SLOT_ADDR where the LHS is obviously safe.
        * tree-nrv.c (execute_return_slot_opt): Set
        CALL_EXPR_HAS_RETURN_SLOT_ADDR based on escape analysis.
        * tree-pass.h: Declare pass_return_slot.
        * tree-optimize.c (init_tree_optimization_passes): Add it.
        
        * cp/semantics.c (simplify_aggr_init_expr): Use
        CALL_EXPR_RETURN_SLOT_OPT, not CALL_EXPR_HAS_RETURN_SLOT_ADDR.

Patches:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.9211&r2=2.9212
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.737&r2=1.738
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/calls.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.389&r2=1.390
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.196&r2=1.197
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-pretty-print.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.63&r2=2.64
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/gimplify.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.136&r2=2.137
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-nrv.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7&r2=2.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-pass.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.42&r2=2.43
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/tree-optimize.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.108&r2=2.109
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4797&r2=1.4798
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/cp/semantics.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.477&r2=1.478
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/opt/nrv9.C.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19317

Reply via email to