gcc-bugs  

Messages by Thread

• [Bug other/92396] -ftime-trace support egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/125259] New: [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 artemiyv at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 artemiyv at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125259] [16/17 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: integral result type precision does not match field size of 'bit_field_ref' since r16-4682 artemiyv at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug sanitizer/120201] [13/14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [13/14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [13/14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [13/14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug lto/125258] New: ICE: zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug lto/125258] ICE: resolution sub id 0xe3d338721a4464e not in object file with -flto -flto-partition=none -fltrans pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug driver/125258] ICE: resolution sub id 0xe3d338721a4464e not in object file with -flto -flto-partition=none -fltrans rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug lto/125257] New: ICE: in partitioner_base, at lto/lto-partition.cc:993 with -flto -flto-partition=cache --param=lto-min-partition=0 on any input zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug lto/125257] ICE: in partitioner_base, at lto/lto-partition.cc:993 with -flto -flto-partition=cache --param=lto-min-partition=0 on any input pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug lto/125257] ICE: in partitioner_base, at lto/lto-partition.cc:993 with -flto -flto-partition=cache --param=lto-min-partition=0 on any input rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug lto/125257] ICE: in partitioner_base, at lto/lto-partition.cc:993 with -flto -flto-partition=cache --param=lto-min-partition=0 on any input mjires at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug lto/125257] ICE: in partitioner_base, at lto/lto-partition.cc:993 with -flto -flto-partition=cache --param=lto-min-partition=0 on any input mjires at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug analyzer/125256] New: feature request: Allow malloc-like functions to opt out of leak warnings andres at anarazel dot de via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug algol68/125255] New: Inaccurate printing of floating point values even when numbers are exactly representable jpl.algol68 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug algol68/125255] Inaccurate printing of floating point values even when numbers are exactly representable jemarch at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug algol68/125254] New: Improper IEEE754 arithmetic results with Inf and NaN jpl.algol68 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/125253] New: [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 herrtimson at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 herrtimson at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 herrtimson at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 herrtimson at yahoo dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/125253] [16/17 Regression] Highway EMU128 tests fail on GCC 16.1.0 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1 tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1 tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c/125252] New: [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/125252] [15/16/17 regression] TBAA vs struct type in C23 (notmuch miscompiled) uecker at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/125251] New: Check reserved identifiers with external linkage for C tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x shivam98.tkg at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x shivam98.tkg at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/112095] `((~x) & y) ^ (x | y)` is x pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/125250] New: [16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 xxs_chy at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 xxs_chy at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 kaelfandrew at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16/17 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125250] [15/16 Regression] wrong code at -O1/2/3 rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/92492] AVX512: Missed vectorization opportunity roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/68186] Using public base member function privately prevents derived classes using base member function pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/68186] Using public base member function privately prevents derived classes using base member function ensadc at mailnesia dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/125249] New: GCC rejects valid program with public indirect based being changed to private jlame646 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125249] GCC rejects valid program with public indirect based being changed to private pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125249] GCC rejects valid program with public indirect based being changed to private pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125249] GCC rejects valid program with public indirect based being changed to private jlame646 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug sanitizer/120201] [14/15/16/17 Regression] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack by r6-6813-g63998a6336239d hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug sanitizer/120201] generates a misaligned vector operation for std::memcpy with -march=znver4 since santizer doesn't allocate properly aligned stack stuart.a.hayhurst at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/124745] [16/17 Regression]ICE in decl_mismatch_context on mismatched constrained friend declaration kaelfandrew at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/125248] New: GCC generates unreachable SVE vector code for prefix-sum loop with distance-1 dependence — dead code from alias check provably foldable at compile time bug_hunters at yeah dot net via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/92750] DSE fails to remove all dead clobbers pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/125247] New: SVE vectorization fails for loop with distance -8 dependence and mixed-type struct — legality analysis bailout, not cost-model bug_hunters at yeah dot net via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125247] SVE vectorization fails for loop with distance -8 dependence and mixed-type struct — legality analysis bailout, not cost-model rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/77899] relative pointer comparisons not folded sometimes pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/67962] Optimization opportunity with conditional swap to two MIN/MAX in phiopt pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/67628] [tree-optimization] (a && b) && c shows better codegen than a && (b && c) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/27504] x && (x & y) not optimized to x & y pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug analyzer/125246] New: Internal compiler error using fanalyzer at supergraph-simplify. patrick.pelissier at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug analyzer/125246] Internal compiler error using fanalyzer at supergraph-simplify. sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug analyzer/125246] Internal compiler error using fanalyzer at supergraph-simplify. patrick.pelissier at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• Let me know if you find this idea interesting Eliza McRee via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/117871] cfg_hooks variable should be c++ification, virtual functions pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/123505] Bit-trick for absolute value fails to optimize pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/125245] New: [17 Regression] ICE at -O1 during RTL pass: x86_cse xxs_chy at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125245] [17 Regression] ICE at -O1 during RTL pass: x86_cse pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125245] [17 Regression] ICE at -O1 during RTL pass: x86_cse pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125245] [17 Regression] ICE at -O1 during RTL pass: x86_cse hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125245] [17 Regression] ICE at -O1 during RTL pass: x86_cse cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125245] [17 Regression] ICE at -O1 during RTL pass: x86_cse xxs_chy at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125245] [17 Regression] ICE at -O1 during RTL pass: x86_cse hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125245] [17 Regression] ICE at -O1 during RTL pass: x86_cse xxs_chy at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/124637] [13/14/15/16 Regression] powerpc64: invalid code while passing a struct via register pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/124637] [13/14/15/16 Regression] powerpc64: invalid code while passing a struct via register glaubitz at debian dot org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/124637] [13/14/15/16 Regression] powerpc64: invalid code while passing a struct via register ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/121500] lambda with by-value deducing this argument and by value capture of non-trivial type produces wrong result cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug analyzer/125244] New: [14/15 regression] -fanalyzer blows the stack with C++ infinite loop sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug analyzer/125244] [14/15 regression] -fanalyzer blows the stack with C++ infinite loop sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/7651] Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning flags heiko at hexco dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/7651] Define -Wextra strictly in terms of other warning flags heiko at hexco dot de via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug analyzer/97110] [meta-bug] tracker bug for supporting C++ in -fanalyzer egallager at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug analyzer/97110] [meta-bug] tracker bug for supporting C++ in -fanalyzer dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/125243] New: Cannot name a non-static member of inaccessible base class in an unevaluated context, even if the member name is accessible ensadc at mailnesia dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/125243] Cannot name a non-static member of inaccessible base class in an unevaluated context, even if the member name is accessible pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/107425] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3060 since r12-6780-gd2ad748eeef0dd26 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/107425] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3060 since r12-6780-gd2ad748eeef0dd26 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/107425] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3060 since r12-6780-gd2ad748eeef0dd26 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/107425] [13/14/15 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3060 since r12-6780-gd2ad748eeef0dd26 pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug other/86656] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=address pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/89891] [meta-bug] Accessing memory in rejected statements or expressions pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/53929] [meta-bug] -masm=intel with global symbol lh_mouse at 126 dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/53929] [meta-bug] -masm=intel with global symbol cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/53929] [meta-bug] -masm=intel with global symbol cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/117871] cfg_hooks variables should be const at least and maybe a virtual functions pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/117871] cfg_hooks variables should be const at least and maybe a virtual functions cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/117871] cfg_hooks variables should be const at least and maybe a virtual functions pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c/125242] New: Potencial regression in the vectorization capability for loops containing an early exit condition (break) when targeting SVE bug_hunters at yeah dot net via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125242] Potencial regression in the vectorization capability for loops containing an early exit condition (break) when targeting SVE pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125242] Potencial regression in the vectorization capability for loops containing an early exit condition (break) when targeting SVE pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/125242] Potencial regression(16.1.0) in the vectorization capability for loops containing an early exit condition (break) when targeting SVE bug_hunters at yeah dot net via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/118443] [Meta bug] Bugs triggered by and blocking more smtgcc testing pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug libstdc++/67903] std::locale compatibility between gcc4.9 and gcc5.1 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug ada/125241] New: Library_Standalone="standard" SAL with tasking leaves consumer's Get_Sec_Stack bound to NT version on aarch64-darwin (GNAT 15.1.2 / GCC 15.0.1) mjgardner at abitofhelp dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125241] Library_Standalone="standard" SAL with tasking leaves consumer's Get_Sec_Stack bound to NT version on aarch64-darwin (GNAT 15.1.2 / GCC 15.0.1) ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125241] Library_Standalone="standard" SAL with tasking leaves consumer's Get_Sec_Stack bound to NT version on aarch64-darwin (GNAT 15.1.2 / GCC 15.0.1) mjgardner at abitofhelp dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125241] Library_Standalone="standard" SAL with tasking leaves consumer's Get_Sec_Stack bound to NT version on aarch64-darwin (GNAT 15.1.2 / GCC 15.0.1) mjgardner at abitofhelp dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125241] Library_Standalone="standard" SAL with tasking leaves consumer's Get_Sec_Stack bound to NT version on aarch64-darwin (GNAT 15.1.2 / GCC 15.0.1) ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125241] Library_Standalone="standard" SAL with tasking leaves consumer's Get_Sec_Stack bound to NT version on aarch64-darwin (GNAT 15.1.2 / GCC 15.0.1) ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning (Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant) gcc at hazardy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning (Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant) redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning (Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant) philipp at fent dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning (Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant) jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning (Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant) jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning (Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant) cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning (Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant) gcc at hazardy dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning (Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant) cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/114385] [13/14/15/16/17 regression] -Wrestrict false positive creating std::string from iterators kaelfandrew at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/114385] [13/14/15/16/17 regression] -Wrestrict false positive creating std::string from iterators kaelfandrew at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug ada/125240] New: Image attribute fails for derived enumeration type with reprepresentaion clause Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125240] Image attribute fails for derived enumeration type with reprepresentaion clause Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125240] Image attribute fails for derived enumeration type with representation clause Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125240] Image attribute fails for derived enumeration type with representation clause Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125240] bogus Image attribute for derived enumeration type with representation clause ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125240] bogus Image attribute for derived enumeration type with representation clause ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125240] broken Image for derived enumeration type with representation clause cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125240] broken Image for derived enumeration type with representation clause cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125240] broken Image for derived enumeration type with representation clause cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125240] broken Image for derived enumeration type with representation clause ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/125240] broken Image for derived enumeration type with representation clause Keith.S.Thompson at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/92624] inconsistent folding of strcmp calls with unterminated arrays kaelfandrew at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/92112] fold strlen after strcmp(a, b) == 0 kaelfandrew at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/92112] fold strlen after strcmp(a, b) == 0 kaelfandrew at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/125239] New: ICE on valid code at -O{2,3} with "-fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2894 zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125239] ICE on valid code at -O{2, 3} with "-fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2894 hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125239] ICE on valid code at -O{2, 3} with "-fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2894 hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125239] [17 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{2,3} with "-fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2894 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125239] [17 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{2,3} with "-fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r17-397 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125239] [17 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{2,3} with "-fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r17-397 hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125239] [17 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{2,3} with "-fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r17-397 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125239] [17 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{2,3} with "-fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r17-397 hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125239] [17 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{2,3} with "-fno-tree-dse -fno-tree-dce" on x86_64-linux-gnu since r17-397 hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/125238] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125238] [17 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125238] [17 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault kaelfandrew at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/125238] [17 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault since r17-397 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

• Earlier messages
• Later messages