------- Comment #15 from green at redhat dot com 2005-11-08 12:54 ------- (In reply to comment #14) > > Then you'll realize that you don't need to bother setting up > > the ffi_cif - all you need is the exception argument. > I doubt that this is right. The ffi_prep_closure() needs to know which > arguments are given to it.
Ah - you're right, of course. But in this case it seems like we can simply define it as zero argument function, returning void. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24616
