------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2006-02-09 15:10 -------
Confirmed.  (there is a missed optimization here also which Richard G. and I am
looking at right now).

Anyways,
Before:
  # p_247 = PHI <&D.2477.a0.x[0](2)>;
<L183>:;
  #   TMT.32_246 = V_MAY_DEF <TMT.32_255>;
  *p_247 = 0B;

After:
#   SFT.12 = V_MAY_DEF <SFT.12>;
#   TMT.32_246 = V_MAY_DEF <TMT.32_255>;
D.2477.a0.x[0] = 0B;

We forgot to rename SFT.12.


-- 

pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2006-02-09 15:10:13
               date|                            |
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.2.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26197

Reply via email to