------- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-09 15:10 ------- Confirmed. (there is a missed optimization here also which Richard G. and I am looking at right now).
Anyways, Before: # p_247 = PHI <&D.2477.a0.x[0](2)>; <L183>:; # TMT.32_246 = V_MAY_DEF <TMT.32_255>; *p_247 = 0B; After: # SFT.12 = V_MAY_DEF <SFT.12>; # TMT.32_246 = V_MAY_DEF <TMT.32_255>; D.2477.a0.x[0] = 0B; We forgot to rename SFT.12. -- pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2006-02-09 15:10:13 date| | Target Milestone|--- |4.2.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26197