------- Comment #7 from rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-16 12:52 ------- No, that patch does not fix the problem. It is however the same type of problem -- vectorizer not updating virtual operands properly (I had tried to find all places in vectorizer where this could happen in that patch, but I obviously missed some).
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26197
