------- Comment #4 from emilp at mac dot com 2006-03-08 15:23 ------- I did come on a bit strong, didn't I? Sorry about that, I'm just a bit frustrated since it used to work better in the gcc 3 series :-)
Do you have a suggestion as to where I could continue this discussion? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26448
