------- Comment #15 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2006-08-28 10:02 ------- (In reply to comment #14)
Sorry about my crazy english today, I'm concentrated on something else... > Unfortunately, for targets like ?386 and Sparc I'm afraid it's the only > option, at the moment. For ia64, powerpc, s390, etc, etc, when the atomic > functions are always available, irrespective of the subtarget, that's fine > of course. Here of course I meant: "everything is fine, of course". > I think we can leave with that, frankly: ... and here I meant: "live with that". -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28671
