Andrew STUBBS wrote: >There's no such thing as an SH4E. There is an SH3E and it shares the >same single-precision support as SH4, thus there are some places where I >would expect to see such an #if.
It is said that the libgcc.a multi-library cannot be made because an impossible register is referred for SH3 if I say easily. It is said that it makes an error of making the multi library in sh-unknown-linux-gnu on the way so that the register definition of 2.4 factions Linux may refer to an impossible combination for this because define is done with SH4E and SH4. Therefore, if this patch is put away without recapitulating as -- target=sh-unknown-linux-gnu, it is sure to become an error. The header file was made here based on crosstools 0.84, and it succeeded in making of all libraries since it had it of seeing the header file. It ..said extent alone.. is not thought that the SH architecture can be basic in my understanding big endian and set little endian to the end. Endian is not seen on the linux side but the SH3 architecture or the SH4 architecture is not passed though the register for SH4 is referred when the header file on the linux side sees the register of SH4 ..seeing... At least, only refer to SH4E SH4 when you see the register added with SH4 on the linux side.
