Motohisa Moriya wrote:
Andrew STUBBS wrote:
There's no such thing as an SH4E. There is an SH3E and it shares the
same single-precision support as SH4, thus there are some places where I
would expect to see such an #if.
It is said that the libgcc.a multi-library cannot be made because an impossible
register is referred for SH3 if I say easily.
It is said that it makes an error of making the multi library in
sh-unknown-linux-gnu on the way so that the register definition of 2.4 factions
Linux may refer to an impossible combination for this because define is done
with SH4E and SH4.
Therefore, if this patch is put away without recapitulating as --
target=sh-unknown-linux-gnu, it is sure to become an error.
The header file was made here based on crosstools 0.84, and it succeeded in
making of all libraries since it had it of seeing the header file.
It ..said extent alone.. is not thought that the SH architecture can be basic in
my understanding big endian and set little endian to the end.
Endian is not seen on the linux side but the SH3 architecture or the SH4
architecture is not passed though the register for SH4 is referred when the
header file on the linux side sees the register of SH4 ..seeing...
At least, only refer to SH4E SH4 when you see the register added with SH4 on the
linux side.
Sorry, I find this very hard to read. I think you found it very hard to
write. :)
I do not say that the code is right. I say that changing SH3E to SH4E is
wrong. It might be that completely removing SH3E is right. Perhaps the
error is somewhere else.
Kaz, I don't know if you have already seen this message. Perhaps you can
help Motohisa, both with the compiler and the language barrier?
Andrew
