------- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-04-13 15:19
-------
(In reply to comment #3)
> It appears that spurious ICE messages are a general problem with GCC.
Well, it's true that an ICE on invalid code *and* after a sensible error
message has been emitted does not have too large an impact for users.
I can reproduce the ICE on minw32, but when I run f951 directly (instead of
letting the driver calling it) it doesn't ICE (even with the same options as
the driver passes to it). So, I can post a backtrace nor investigate :(
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-04-13 15:19:32
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31519
