------- Comment #2 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org  2007-09-30 16:53 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> Re-reading the Fortran standard, I believe now that already "call foo(10)" is
> invalid (although it is not ambiguous).

In fact, I believe that the ambiguity in the interface is an error; this one
liner fixes the PR -

Index: /svn/trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c
===================================================================
*** /svn/trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c  (revision 128873)
--- /svn/trunk/gcc/fortran/interface.c  (working copy)
*************** check_interface1 (gfc_interface *p, gfc_
*** 1044,1050 ****
        if (p->sym->name == q->sym->name && p->sym->module == q->sym->module)
          continue;

!       if (compare_interfaces (p->sym, q->sym, generic_flag))
          {
            if (referenced)
              {
--- 1044,1051 ----
        if (p->sym->name == q->sym->name && p->sym->module == q->sym->module)
          continue;

!       if (compare_interfaces (p->sym, q->sym, generic_flag)
!             || p->sym->name == q->sym->name)
          {
            if (referenced)
              {

It's just now regtesting.

Paul


-- 

pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |pault at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2007-09-30 16:53:34
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33542

Reply via email to