------- Comment #3 from dougkwan at google dot com 2007-10-08 19:50 ------- Subject: Re: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess errors)
That's strange. I am looking at it. I ran the libstdc++ testsuite before and did not see this problem. -Doug 8 Oct 2007 19:32:42 -0000, dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > ------- Comment #2 from dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2007-10-08 > 19:32 ------- > Subject: Re: FAIL: 17_intro/headers/all_pedantic_errors.cc (test for excess > errors) > > > ------- Comment #1 from pcarlini at suse dot de 2007-10-08 18:57 ------- > > So the problem is new, right? Has it to do with the recent fixes for the > > deadlock bug? > > Looking at the testresults, it appears to have been introduced between > 128587 and 128594 in September. The only patch of significance in this > period is Jason's 128590. It's not obvious to me why this would have > affected the behavior of -pedantic. > > Dave > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33700
