------- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-15 17:17 ------- I think this has been caused by the fix for PR29738.
Author: rakdver Date: Thu Nov 9 00:09:43 2006 New Revision: 118602 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118602 Log: PR tree-optimization/29738 * tree-ssa-ccp.c: Remove UNKNOWN_VAL from comments. (ccp_lattice_t): Remove UNKNOWN_VAL. (dump_lattice_value, ccp_lattice_meet, ccp_visit_phi_node): Do not handle UNKNOWN_VAL. (get_default_value): Set initial value of virtual operands to VARYING. (get_value): Always use get_default_value on uninitialized operands. (set_value_varying, surely_varying_stmt_p): New functions. (set_lattice_value): Do not pass argument to get_value. Do not handle UNKNOWN_VAL. (likely_value): Follow the semantics described in the comment. (ccp_initialize): Use surely_varying_stmt_p. Do not mark phi nodes DONT_SIMULATE_AGAIN. (ccp_fold): Do not pass argument to get_value. (fold_const_aggregate_ref, visit_assignment): Ditto. Do not handle UNKNOWN_VAL. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ccp-14.c: New test. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ssa-ccp-15.c: New test. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |29738 nThis| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34099
