------- Comment #30 from mark at codesourcery dot com 2008-01-07 07:44 ------- Subject: Re: [4.2/4.3 regression] ICE with incompatible types for ?: with "complex type" conversion
gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu wrote: > | Is it conceivable that ISO C++ will ever add a > | complex<double>::complex(int) constructor that doesn't set the real part > | to the value of the argument (converted to double), and the imaginary > | part to zero? > > That isn't the issue. My concern is whether ISO C++ will ever > change conversion rules, say from integers to floats or doubles. The > answer is likely. What's the likely change? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31780
