------- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-01-14 12:35 ------- The testcase in comment #3 looks valid(?), at least EDG accepts it. The problem is we try to fold_non_dependent_expr
n = n0 > max_shift ? max_shift : n0, but substituting n0 makes this expression dependent and we leak template param lists to fold. -- rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |ice-on-valid-code Priority|P4 |P2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34774