------- Comment #12 from tbptbp at gmail dot com 2008-01-14 12:47 ------- Subject: Re: [4.1/4.2/4.3 Regression] templates, enumerations, overflow, ice
On 14 Jan 2008 12:35:51 -0000, rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The testcase in comment #3 looks valid(?), at least EDG accepts it. The > problem is we try to fold_non_dependent_expr > > n = n0 > max_shift ? max_shift : n0, > > but substituting n0 makes this expression dependent and we leak template > param lists to fold. I'm no language lawyer, but the whole exercise is supposed to be valid. It has been mutilated for msvc2k5, and it works there. It also works with g++ when it doesn't fault (that is when i use an alternative implementation). Icc 10.1 doesn't complain either before crashing ;) So, to me, with my rosy teinted glasses strapped on, it has never been an ice-on-invalid. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34774
