------- Comment #1 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-03-05 21:45
-------
What kind of system do you have, to have a <complex.h> without complex defined
in it? (sounds kind of useless)
I suggest the following patch:
Index: libgfortran.h
===================================================================
--- libgfortran.h (revision 132578)
+++ libgfortran.h (working copy)
@@ -42,10 +42,12 @@
#if HAVE_COMPLEX_H
# include <complex.h>
-#else
-#define complex __complex__
#endif
+#if !defined(HAVE_COMPLEX_H) || !defined(complex)
+# define complex __complex__
+#endif
+
#include "../gcc/fortran/libgfortran.h"
#include "c99_protos.h"
--
fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Summary|gfortran build fails in |libgfortran fails with
|libgfortran |nonstandard <complex.h>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35471
