------- Comment #5 from igodard at pacbell dot net 2008-07-29 01:07 ------- Please confirm that it is an error with your associates.
First, Comeau likes it. Second, other template functions have no trouble identifying a template base class given a derived class. What is different about this case is that the base class is one that takes a template rather than a class or constant. Templates taking templates are unusual, and I'd be not surprised that g++ was insufficiently tested in this area. -- igodard at pacbell dot net changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36961