------- Comment #8 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-10-09 13:31 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > Tobias, should A(3)%M not be 89??
Yes. I realized too late that I pasted the output of a slightly different program, which I used during testing. In any case today's build gives the same output as NAG f95 (excepts that NAG writes the namelist as "&NAMLIS A = 1 5 2 6 89 99/") and the same output as ifort. [Sidenote: NAG's format works also with gfortran since at least 4.2.] > Jerry, I think that your namelist_54.f90 should test the values of A(3) > as well as A(1) and A(2) I agree with Paul that A(3)%m and A(3)%n should also be tested. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37707
