------- Comment #3 from hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-01-29 20:09 ------- (In reply to comment #2) > If you use -std=c99 -pedantic-errors you get an error, as expected. > You're compiling in gnu89 mode. > > If you use -std=c99 without -pedantic-errors you get a duplicate warning: > > t.c:1: warning: inline function 'foo' declared but never defined > t.c:1: warning: inline function 'foo' declared but never defined >
So the code is valid in gnu89 mode, which is the default. With -std=c99 and without -pedantic-errors, shouldn't we generate working binary? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39026
