------- Comment #4 from dnovillo at gcc dot gnu dot org  2009-02-04 17:49 
-------
Testing patch with the more straightforward of the two suggestions from Cary:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-01/msg00105.html


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39001

Reply via email to