gcc-bugs  

Messages by Thread

• • [Bug c++/122070] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE with type aliases in inherited CTAD since r15-2864 ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/122070] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE with type aliases in inherited CTAD since r15-2864 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/122070] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE with type aliases in inherited CTAD since r15-2864 egas.g.ribeiro at tecnico dot ulisboa.pt via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/123043] New: [16 Regression] ICE on zlib -O3: GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 133 does not dominate use in block 130 slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123043] [16 Regression] ICE on zlib -O3: GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 133 does not dominate use in block 130 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123043] [16 Regression] ICE on zlib -O3: GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 133 does not dominate use in block 130 since r16-5780 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123043] [16 Regression] ICE on zlib -O3: GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 133 does not dominate use in block 130 since r16-5780 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123043] [16 Regression] ICE on zlib -O3: GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 133 does not dominate use in block 130 since r16-5780 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123043] [16 Regression] ICE on zlib -O3: GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 133 does not dominate use in block 130 since r16-5780 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123043] [16 Regression] ICE on zlib -O3: GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 133 does not dominate use in block 130 since r16-5780 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123043] [16 Regression] ICE on zlib -O3: GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 133 does not dominate use in block 130 since r16-5780 tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123043] [16 Regression] ICE on zlib -O3: GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 133 does not dominate use in block 130 since r16-5780 tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123043] [16 Regression] ICE on zlib -O3: GIMPLE pass: vect: verify_ssa failed: definition in block 133 does not dominate use in block 130 since r16-5780 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug analyzer/109579] -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds false positive in Emacs mapping stack eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug analyzer/123042] New: - -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds false positive in Emacs mapping stack (revisiting 109579) eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/123041] New: Assembler names for functions are ignored in templates fw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/123041] Assembler names for functions are ignored in templates pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/123041] Assembler names for functions are ignored in templates fw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/122070] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE in C++23 type deduction since r15-2864 nshead at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/122070] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE in C++23 type deduction since r15-2864 egas.g.ribeiro at tecnico dot ulisboa.pt via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/118317] `len - (len != 0) + 1` should optimize to `len == 0 ? 1 : len` law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/118360] [avr] Expensive shift instead of bit test law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/118360] [avr] Expensive shift instead of bit test gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/118360] [avr] Expensive shift instead of bit test rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/118360] [avr] Expensive shift instead of bit test gjl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/118360] [avr] Expensive shift instead of bit test rguenther at suse dot de via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/118360] [avr] Expensive shift instead of bit test dimitar at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/67731] Combine of OR'ed bitfields should use bit-test fw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/119420] `a >> 1 == 0` should be trasformed into `((unsigned)a) <= 1` law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/119420] `a >> 1 == 0` should be trasformed into `((unsigned)a) <= 1` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/123040] New: [15/16 regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call(vec_duplicate_expr) in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2919 schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123040] [15/16 regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call(vec_duplicate_expr) in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2919 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123040] [15/16 regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call(vec_duplicate_expr) in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2919 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123040] [15/16 regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call(vec_duplicate_expr) in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2919 [r15-3509-gd34cda72098867] schwab--- via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123040] [15/16 regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call(vec_duplicate_expr) in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2919 [r15-3509-gd34cda72098867] pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123040] [15/16 regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call(vec_duplicate_expr) in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2919 [r15-3509-gd34cda72098867] rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123040] [15/16 regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call(vec_duplicate_expr) in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2919 [r15-3509-gd34cda72098867] rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123040] [15/16 regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call(vec_duplicate_expr) in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2919 [r15-3509-gd34cda72098867] cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123040] [15 regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_call(vec_duplicate_expr) in gimple_assign_rhs_code, at gimple.h:2919 [r15-3509-gd34cda72098867] rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/119509] Missed optimization for comparison of division equivalent to right shift law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/119509] Missed optimization for comparison of division equivalent to right shift skrll at netbsd dot org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/123039] New: crc loop recognition fails at -O3 camel-cdr at protonmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123039] crc loop recognition fails at -O3 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c/119011] -Wsign-compare: false positive with integer literals comparing to unsigned integers of rank no less than int foss+gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/119011] -Wsign-compare: false positive with integer literals comparing to unsigned integers of rank no less than int jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/119011] -Wsign-compare: false positive with integer literals comparing to unsigned integers of rank no less than int foss+gcc--- via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/112814] `Plus <PHI <a,b>, PHI<b,a>>` is not optimized to just PLUS<a,b> pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/123038] New: AArch64: ICE at O3 during GIMPLE pass: vect xxs_chy at outlook dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123038] [16 Regression] ICE at O3 during GIMPLE pass: vect pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123038] [16 Regression] ICE at O3 during GIMPLE pass: vect pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123038] [16 Regression] ICE at O3 during GIMPLE pass: vect pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123038] [16 Regression] ICE at O3 during GIMPLE pass: vect pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123038] [16 Regression] ICE at O3 during GIMPLE pass: vect rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123038] [16 Regression] ICE at O3 during GIMPLE pass: vect cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123038] [16 Regression] ICE at O3 during GIMPLE pass: vect rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/122783] gcc 15,16 refuses to compile correctly with nvptx target blackwell cards (sm_120) CUDA_ERROR_INVALID_CONTEXT (error 201), CUDA_ERROR_NOT_FOUND (error 500) schulz.benjamin at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/122783] gcc 15,16 refuses to compile correctly with nvptx target blackwell cards (sm_120) CUDA_ERROR_INVALID_CONTEXT (error 201), CUDA_ERROR_NOT_FOUND (error 500) schulz.benjamin at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/122783] gcc 15,16 refuses to compile correctly with nvptx target blackwell cards after drivers with cuda-13 were installed: CUDA_ERROR_NOT_FOUND (error 500) (result of an abi change in cuda-13) schulz.benjamin at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug ada/123037] New: Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/123037] Ada cross to i686-w64-mingw32 fails to build cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/113651] The GCC optimizer performs poorly on a very simple code snippet. pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/123036] New: NaN != NaN should be true, but fails janschultke at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/123036] NaN != NaN should be true, but fails janschultke at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/123036] NaN != NaN should be true, but fails pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/123036] NaN != NaN should be true, but fails pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/123036] NaN != NaN should be true, but fails pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/123036] NaN != NaN should be true, but fails janschultke at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/123035] New: missing optimization with bitfields on the gimple level pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123035] missing optimization with bitfields on the gimple level rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123035] missing optimization with bitfields on the gimple level pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/107772] function prologue generated even though it's only needed in an unlikely path pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/122343] Propagate volatile memory operands cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug rtl-optimization/122343] Propagate volatile memory operands hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug rtl-optimization/122343] Propagate volatile memory operands cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug rtl-optimization/122343] Propagate volatile memory operands cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug rtl-optimization/122343] Propagate volatile memory operands cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/121498] long branches requires ra register but not modeled; causes issues sometimes with shrink wrapping and/or leaf functions pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/109009] Shrink Wrap missed opportunity pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/84443] powerpc suboptimal code generation (shrink wrap unlikely path) for Linux spinlocks pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/67856] callee-saved register saves should be shrink-wrapped pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c/123034] New: gcc generates misaligned SSE wuz73 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/123034] gcc generates misaligned SSE wuz73 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c/123033] New: gcc generates misaligned SSE wuz73 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c/123033] gcc generates misaligned SSE wuz73 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123033] gcc generates misaligned SSE pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123033] gcc generates misaligned SSE wuz73 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123033] gcc generates misaligned SSE pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123033] gcc generates misaligned SSE wuz73 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123033] gcc generates misaligned SSE pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/91420] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_HI20 against `.LC0' with GCC 8.2/8.3 with "-O2" on RISC-V cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/91420] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_HI20 against `.LC0' with GCC 8.2/8.3 with "-O2" on RISC-V zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/123032] New: [16 Regression] wrong code on libsodium-1.0.20 since r16-5780-g65a3849eb46df2 (possibly fixed by r16-5849-g4a1247a3b070cd) slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123032] [16 Regression] wrong code on libsodium-1.0.20 since r16-5780-g65a3849eb46df2 (possibly fixed by r16-5849-g4a1247a3b070cd) sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123032] [16 Regression] wrong code on libsodium-1.0.20 since r16-5780-g65a3849eb46df2 (possibly fixed by r16-5849-g4a1247a3b070cd) rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123032] [16 Regression] wrong code on libsodium-1.0.20 since r16-5780-g65a3849eb46df2 (possibly fixed by r16-5849-g4a1247a3b070cd) tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123032] [16 Regression] wrong code on libsodium-1.0.20 since r16-5780-g65a3849eb46df2 (possibly fixed by r16-5849-g4a1247a3b070cd) cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123032] [16 Regression] wrong code on libsodium-1.0.20 since r16-5780-g65a3849eb46df2 (possibly fixed by r16-5849-g4a1247a3b070cd) tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/58681] Missed RTL optimization - same insns before unconditional jump as before the jump target pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/58681] Missed RTL optimization - same insns before unconditional jump as before the jump target pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/58681] Missed RTL optimization - same insns before unconditional jump as before the jump target pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/58681] Missed RTL optimization - same insns before unconditional jump as before the jump target pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/122777] [16 Regression] 5-8% slowdown of 454.calculix and 548.exchange2_r on AMD Zen{4,5} since r16-5258-g1d8e2d51e5c5cb pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/122777] [16 Regression] 5-8% slowdown of 454.calculix and 548.exchange2_r on AMD Zen{4,5} since r16-5258-g1d8e2d51e5c5cb pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/122777] [16 Regression] 5-8% slowdown of 454.calculix and 548.exchange2_r on AMD Zen{4,5} since r16-5258-g1d8e2d51e5c5cb pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/122777] [16 Regression] 5-8% slowdown of 454.calculix and 548.exchange2_r on AMD Zen{4,5} since r16-5258-g1d8e2d51e5c5cb pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/122777] [16 Regression] 5-8% slowdown of 454.calculix and 548.exchange2_r on AMD Zen{4,5} since r16-5258-g1d8e2d51e5c5cb pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/112835] inverting the result of memcmp() produces inefficient code fw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/87051] is_trivially_move_constructible wrongly gives `false` for class with user-provided non-const copy constructor arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug ada/115349] wrong Accum_Type inferred for a reduction expression ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/115349] wrong Accum_Type inferred for a reduction expression cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug ada/115349] wrong Accum_Type inferred for a reduction expression ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/123031] New: False positive -Warray-bounds triggered by std::sort gccbugs--- via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/123031] False positive -Warray-bounds triggered by std::sort gccbugs--- via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/123031] False positive -Warray-bounds triggered by std::sort gccbugs--- via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug ada/118082] bogus undefined reference in value sequence of reduction expression within generic body ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/103414] [13/14/15/16 Regression] [PDT] ICE in gfc_free_actual_arglist, at fortran/expr.c:547 since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954 pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/103414] [13/14/15/16 Regression] [PDT] ICE in gfc_free_actual_arglist, at fortran/expr.c:547 since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/103414] [13/14/15/16 Regression] [PDT] ICE in gfc_free_actual_arglist, at fortran/expr.c:547 since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954 pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/87477] [meta-bug] [F03] issues concerning the ASSOCIATE statement pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/46555] [13/14/15/16 Regression] PHI RTL expansion leads to CSiBE regression pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/46555] [13/14/15/16 Regression] PHI RTL expansion leads to CSiBE regression cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/46555] [13/14/15/16 Regression] PHI RTL expansion leads to CSiBE regression pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/46555] [13/14/15/16 Regression] PHI RTL expansion leads to CSiBE regression cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug middle-end/111373] conditional selection gives bad code generation pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/111373] conditional selection gives bad code generation pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug middle-end/111373] conditional selection gives bad code generation pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/122741] [PDT] Bugs preventing build of fiats pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/122741] [PDT] Bugs preventing build of fiats pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/122741] [PDT] Bugs preventing build of fiats pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/122741] [PDT] Bugs preventing build of fiats pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/122693] [PDT] Failure to recognize variable names in function with a local allocatable PDT array cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/122693] [PDT] Failure to recognize variable names in function with a local allocatable PDT array pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/122670] [PDT] Mismatched types with same name in assignment cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/122670] [PDT] Mismatched types with same name in assignment pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/122669] ALLOCATE without array specification or array-valued SOURCE= expression fails in compilation cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/122669] ALLOCATE without array specification or array-valued SOURCE= expression fails in compilation pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/122578] [PDT] untyped associate name , unrecognized component declaration, unresolved generic binding cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/122578] [PDT] untyped associate name , unrecognized component declaration, unresolved generic binding pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug rtl-optimization/122403] [16 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-8.c and gcc.target/aarch64/sme/za_state_4.c and gcc.target/aarch64/sme/zt0_state_5.c now fails since r16-4438 law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug rtl-optimization/122403] [16 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/stack-protector-8.c and gcc.target/aarch64/sme/za_state_4.c and gcc.target/aarch64/sme/zt0_state_5.c now fails since r16-4438 law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/119468] PPCLE: Inefficient implementation of __builtin_parityll segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/119468] PPCLE: Inefficient implementation of __builtin_parityll avinashd at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c++/123030] New: [4.9 Regression] [accepts-invalid] no error for calling a deleted destructor in array new richard-gccbugzilla at metafoo dot co.uk via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/123030] [13/14/15/16 Regression] [accepts-invalid] no error for calling a deleted destructor in array new pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/123030] [13/14/15/16 Regression] [accepts-invalid] no error for calling a deleted destructor in array new pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/123030] [13/14/15/16 Regression] [accepts-invalid] no error for calling a deleted destructor in array new since r0-126018 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/123030] [13/14/15/16 Regression] [accepts-invalid] no error for calling a deleted destructor in array new since r0-126018 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/123030] [13/14/15/16 Regression] [accepts-invalid] no error for calling a deleted destructor in array new since r0-126018 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug c++/123030] [13/14/15 Regression] [accepts-invalid] no error for calling a deleted destructor in array new since r0-126018 jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/123029] New: OPEN statement with BLANK= is erroneously flagged by -std=f95 w6ws at earthlink dot net via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/123029] OPEN statement with BLANK= is erroneously flagged by -std=f95 jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/123029] OPEN statement with BLANK= is erroneously flagged by -std=f95 jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug fortran/123028] New: fortran front end does not conform to GNU coding standards re comments sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/123028] fortran front end does not conform to GNU coding standards re comments pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/123028] fortran front end does not conform to GNU coding standards re comments sandra at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug fortran/123028] fortran front end does not conform to GNU coding standards re comments kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug c/111811] [14/15/16 Regression] ICE with vector float bitfield after error pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/123027] New: [14/15/16 Regression] minss is not used with -ffinite-math-only pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123027] [14/15/16 Regression] minss is not used with -ffinite-math-only pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123027] [14/15/16 Regression] minss is not used with -ffinite-math-only since r14-2699 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123027] [14/15/16 Regression] minss is not used with -ffinite-math-only since r14-2699 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123027] [14/15/16 Regression] minss is not used with -ffinite-math-only since r14-2699 liuhongt at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123027] [14/15/16 Regression] minss is not used with -ffinite-math-only since r14-2699 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123027] [14/15/16 Regression] minss is not used with -ffinite-math-only since r14-2699 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123027] [14/15 Regression] minss is not used with -ffinite-math-only since r14-2699 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug target/123026] New: aarch64: wrong code for vectorized loop kristerw at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123026] [16 Regression] aarch64: wrong code for vectorized loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123026] [16 Regression] aarch64: wrong code for vectorized loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123026] [16 Regression] aarch64: wrong code for vectorized loop pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123026] [16 Regression] aarch64: wrong code for vectorized loop since r16-4560 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123026] [16 Regression] aarch64: wrong code for vectorized loop since r16-4560 rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123026] [16 Regression] aarch64: wrong code for vectorized loop since r16-4560 cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug target/123026] [16 Regression] aarch64: wrong code for vectorized loop since r16-4560 tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug libstdc++/120446] [C++23] Implement P2655R3 common_reference_t of reference_wrapper Should Be a Reference Type cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120446] [C++23] Implement P2655R3 common_reference_t of reference_wrapper Should Be a Reference Type cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120446] [C++23] Implement P2655R3 common_reference_t of reference_wrapper Should Be a Reference Type cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120446] [C++23] Implement P2655R3 common_reference_t of reference_wrapper Should Be a Reference Type ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120446] [C++23] Implement P2655R3 common_reference_t of reference_wrapper Should Be a Reference Type cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/120446] [C++23] Implement P2655R3 common_reference_t of reference_wrapper Should Be a Reference Type cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug tree-optimization/122824] Array out-of-bounds warning when building with optimization greater than -O1 d7d1cd at mail dot ru via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/122824] Array out-of-bounds warning when building with optimization greater than -O1 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug tree-optimization/122824] Array out-of-bounds warning when building with optimization greater than -O1 pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug libstdc++/111550] The range adaptor closure object generated by adaptor(args...) is not a perfect forwarding call wrapper cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
  • [Bug libstdc++/111550] The range adaptor closure object generated by adaptor(args...) is not a perfect forwarding call wrapper ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
• [Bug libstdc++/111327] std::bind_front (and std::not_fn) doesn't always perfectly forward according to value category of the call wrapper object cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs

• Earlier messages
• Later messages