------- Comment #5 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-02-22 12:59 -------
Indeed.
But Rob, Pinski has a point: There really are better things to spend your time
on than building development branches. Such branches are often highly
experimental or very unstable, so bugs are not usually tracked in bugzilla but
in the branch maintainer's head or email box. We only track bugs on branches
for some of the higher-profile branches that are more-or-less stable and close
to being merged (like the alias-improvements branch, or LTO).
--
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2009-02-22 12:59:32
date| |
Summary|[miro] revision 144368 - |[miro] branch listed as
|"make -i check" autogen |active development branch
|"fixinclude test FAILURES" |appears to be dead
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39265
