------- Comment #14 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-10 19:06 -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> The code in comment #1 still does not give the right result. I get
> (intel-darwin):
No, it's not right. We have seen this before with module assignments involving
derived types.
It should be noted that this is an entirely different bug to the original one.
In the case of the first, the dependency was missed. In this second, it is
detected OK but the components of the lhs that are not assigned to by the
module procedure are left indeterminate.
Daniel, I expect this looks familiar????
Cheers
Paul
--
pault at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |d at domob dot eu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38863
