------- Comment #15 from domob at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-04-14 15:16 ------- (In reply to comment #14) > In the case of the first, the dependency was missed. In this second, it is > detected OK but the components of the lhs that are not assigned to by the > module procedure are left indeterminate. > > Daniel, I expect this looks familiar????
Yes, it does... somewhat. I'll try to find something out about this one, though I've so far no idea (apart from that it looks similar :D). Daniel -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38863
