------- Comment #3 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-05-13 17:15 -------
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/interface_19.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) > FAIL: gfortran.dg/proc_ptr_result_1.f90 -O0 (test for excess errors) > > The last of these three test cases is probably invalid, the second failure > seems to be a problem with intrinsics, and about the first one I'm not sure. For intrinsics, the intent of the arguments is currently not considered at all. We need gfc_intrinsic_arg to have an 'intent' member. The F03 standard says: The dummy arguments of the specific intrinsic procedures in 13.6 have INTENT(IN). The dummy arguments of the generic intrinsic procedures in 13.7 have INTENT(IN) if the intent is not stated explicitly. The test case proc_ptr_result_1.f90 is invalid indeed. Relevant quote from the standard: Section 5.1.2.7: INTENT (INOUT) is not equivalent to omitting the INTENT attribute. The argument corresponding to an INTENT (INOUT) dummy argument always shall be definable, while an argument corresponding to a dummy argument without an INTENT attribute need be definable only if the dummy argument is actually redefined. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40039
