The following testcase fails on g++ 4.4.0 and 4.3.2: #include <cstdlib>
enum Enum { Foo }; class A { public: A(int y) : x(y) {} explicit A(Enum) : x(1) {} int x; }; static void fun(A a = Foo) { if (a.x != static_cast<int>(Foo)) { abort(); } } int main() { fun(); return 0; } If the A(int) ctor is removed the program does not compile, as is expected. If the line "A a = Foo" appears inside the function instead of the parameter list then g++ correctly uses the A(int) ctor. While on that topic: The code above was meant to use the Enum ctor, it would be nice if g++ emits a warning about the emitted code probably using the wrong ctor. -- Summary: explicit constructor is used where only implicit ctors are allowed Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kretz at kde dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40685