------- Comment #5 from janus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-05 13:21 ------- (In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > Tobias, do you remember any of your thoughts when writing this? > > Well, they are essentially written in the patch email (linked from the PR
Yeah, ok, the general idea sounds fine. What I meant was that the way in which you copy the cl seems to create a memory leak (cf. comment #2), since the newly created cl is not reachable from any ns->cl_list. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40877
