------- Comment #4 from ktietz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-09-05 11:20 ------- (In reply to comment #3) > (In reply to comment #2) > > Ok, could you sent a patch for it. It is pre-approved by me. > > I can't test it, have you? >
I am retesting it. I think {v:-v} is better here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41024
