------- Comment #5 from joerg dot richter at pdv-fs dot de  2009-09-18 13:47 
-------
I found Doug Gregors workaround for this pair problem:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2008-10/msg00080.html

I wonder why it was reverted 9 days later?  I couldn't find any discussion on
gcc-patches nor libstdc++.  Perhaps I have missed something.  Was this patch
not good enough? 

The reason I ask is that I want to use C++0x.  Currently I do this with
"-std=gnu++0x -U__GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__"

I undefine __GXX_EXPERIMENTAL_CXX0X__ just because of the pair(0) problem.
But unfortunately this doesn't give me the library features of C++0x :(


-- 

joerg dot richter at pdv-fs dot de changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |joerg dot richter at pdv-fs
                   |                            |dot de


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40925

Reply via email to