------- Comment #7 from hp at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-12 04:12 ------- (In reply to comment #6) > PR39685 also looks related, but with a different instruction kind
Huh? That's a different port. (In reply to comment #6) > Hm, also see PR23424. Why? Wrong number? > HP - time to revisit these? Now *that*'s true! But... this was a duplicate. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36482
