------- Comment #10 from jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-10-23 17:33 -------
Created an attachment (id=18881)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18881&action=view)
gcc44-pr41762.patch
Patch I'm going to bootstrap/regtest.
As ix86 backend doesn't know what kind of VALUE preserving mode the pass it
occurs in uses, it needs to be prepared even for VALUEs discarded as useless by
remove_useless_values, similarly e.g. to get_addr in alias.c which also checks
for them.
--
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41762
