------- Comment #9 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2009-11-16 10:34 -------
The failures reported in comment #8 have disappeared between revisions 154188
and 154190 (compare http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg01435.html
and http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2009-11/msg01388.html), likely fixed
by revision 154189:
* gcc.dg/lto/lto.exp: For non-lto, bail out before calling
init functions.
Is it right to conclude that the failures were due to revision 154104?
2009-11-11 H.J. Lu <hongjiu...@intel.com>
PR testsuite/42001
* gcc.dg/lto/lto.exp: Pass no-mathlib to lto_init. Call
lto_finish at the end.
* lib/lto.exp (lto_init): Set mathlib to " " for no-mathlib.
(lto_finish): New. Restore mathlib.
If yes, understanding the origin of the failures triggered by revision 154104
may help to produce a reduced test case for this PR.
--
dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hjl dot tools at gmail dot
| |com, hp at axis dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41473
