------- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-23 13:44 ------- Without the patch it is rejected, with the patch it is not. I will look into this further.
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42008
[Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected derived types with default initializers in PURE procedures
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:44:59 -0800
- [Bug fortran/42008] New: Wrongly rejecte... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
- [Bug fortran/42008] Wrongly rejected... jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
