------- Comment #6 from rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-15 17:36 -------
<tromey> rth: sorry... yeah, I tested the aranges patch and it worked for me.
but it isn't clear we will need it now, we're discussing some form of caching
w/ gdb rather than using the index sections
<rth> ok. i'll leave the patch alone until you tell me we need it.
--
rth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42288
