------- Comment #14 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-01-21 16:21 ------- Great. Indeed, that way works. Actually, I was surprised to see result_of used with launch named in the template argument?!?
Anyway, we also have the residual nit that I had to change to public the explicit constructor future(const __state_type&). I suppose isn't a big issue... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42819