------- Comment #15 from jwakely dot gcc at gmail dot com 2010-01-21 16:28 ------- (In reply to comment #14) > Anyway, we also have the residual nit that I had to change to public the > explicit constructor future(const __state_type&). I suppose isn't a big > issue...
Did you change _Fn::result_type on lines 122 and 561? async _should_ be a friend, and not need the public constructor -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42819
