------- Comment #11 from paul dot richard dot thomas at gmail dot com
2010-01-21 20:25 -------
Subject: Re: [4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression] Wrong-code with
allocatable or pointer components in elemental functions
Thanks, Tobias.
I am not sure that it is unnecessary - for that reason, I am glad to
have found an alternative fix to this PR. Fortunately, it is right on
the apex of a seriously small corner case :-)
Paul
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:20 PM, burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org
<gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
>
> ------- Comment #10 from burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-21 16:20
> -------
> (In reply to comment #9)
>> Have posted a fix on the list today.
>
> Latest patch by Paul (which has been approved):
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2010-01/msg00134.html
>
> I have filled PR 42831 regarding the missed optimization of using an
> unnecessary array temporary.
>
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42736
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
> You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
>
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42736
