------- Comment #40 from davek at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-01-27 18:17 ------- (In reply to comment #39) > looks as though the .ii was created using -std=c++0x and then the compiler > output obtained by compiling it without -std=c++0x > > that's never going to work >
:) Yeah, I finally got there sometime around comment 33. I'll be ducking out of this one now, unless anyone needs me. Cheers all! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42880
