------- Comment #4 from pinskia at gmail dot com 2010-03-01 10:38 ------- Subject: Re: [4.5 Regression] Worse code generated with -O2
Sent from my iPhone On Mar 1, 2010, at 2:29 AM, "rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org > wrote: > > > ------- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-03-01 > 10:29 ------- > Huh. Confirmed. Not that interesting because the aliasing sets are different and we made 4.5 work for c++ code dealing with dynamic types. > > > -- > > rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: > > What |Removed |Added > --- > --- > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW > Ever Confirmed|0 |1 > Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2010-03-01 10:29:21 > date| | > Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43213 > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43213
