------- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com  2010-03-26 16:47 -------
(In reply to comment #7)

> > Yep, that's the right version.
> 
> Well, but negative sizes do not make much sense, so I think ,1 makes more
> sense (with unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT then).

Eh, what now?


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43528

Reply via email to