------- Comment #8 from ubizjak at gmail dot com 2010-03-26 16:47 ------- (In reply to comment #7)
> > Yep, that's the right version. > > Well, but negative sizes do not make much sense, so I think ,1 makes more > sense (with unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT then). Eh, what now? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43528