------- Comment #31 from rguenther at suse dot de 2010-04-06 11:00 ------- Subject: Re: [4.5 regression] 0.5% code size regression caused by r147852
On Tue, 6 Apr 2010, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Comment #30 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-06 10:56 > ------- > I think it is a really, really bad signal if a bug like this, where the > revision that introduced the issue was identified >9 months ago, remains > unfixed for GCC 4.5. > > I, for one, wouldn't care hunting down revisions that introduce regressions in > stage1 anymore, if component maintainers and release managers just postpone > fixing the issue until it is too late to fix for a release. Well, the fix doesn't fix this bug. There's no patch to fix this bug (yet). Also 0.5% code size increase doesn't look important enough to me. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40436