------- Comment #6 from pault at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-30 14:33 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > Another OOP problem found by Salvatore. > > Jim Xia confirms that NAG f95 gives the correct result, cf. > http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.fortran/browse_thread/thread/e18d0434c46598e2 > > "The GENERIC is Fortran is designed as such that the invocation is resolved at > compile time to a specific binding. In your case, af2%do() and af2%get() both > are solved to call binding a2f%doit() and af2%getit(). These two calls are > equivalent to af2%doit() and af2%getit(). And based on the dynamic type of > af2, routines doit2() and getit2() are both called."
This presumably applies to operators? I sincerely hope so because this will make life MUCH easier. Cheers Paul -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43945