------- Comment #6 from numerical dot simulation at web dot de 2010-05-03 12:53 ------- Hi!
Though I love the fact that this code now compiles, I am still unsure whether this is the right thing to have. >From http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#502 I see >that the proposed resolution (February, 2010) stands against what David Vandevoorde said in http://groups.google.de/group/comp.lang.c++.moderated/browse_thread/thread/8c3b8a84ed78b003/4d9603171894a75d?hl=de#4d9603171894a75d and the enum now is dependent and so IMHO the code should not compile. Maybe I missed something. Could you please shed some more light on this? Markus Werle -- numerical dot simulation at web dot de changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31584
