------- Comment #3 from steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-06 21:24 ------- What's the plan with the patch of comment #2? NB, the result of gfc_dep_compare_expr (l_start, r_start) could be cached instead of computed twice:
+ && ((res = gfc_dep_compare_expr (l_start, r_start)) == 0 + || res == -1) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44235
