------- Comment #26 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-08-11 19:54 
-------
>This code does not compile in GCC, and so is not portable.

No it is not portable because that code is just plain invalid; though MS
accepts it as it is implementing something called "move constructor" as an
extension.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45249

Reply via email to