------- Comment #29 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-11 20:33 ------- (In reply to comment #28) > (In reply to comment #23) > > First off I already mentioned what is undefined in this example in comment > > #11. > > The part of the standard that mentions about arrays. And how the address > > of a > > scalar is considered an array of size 1. I don't have the standard in > > front of > > me right now but those are what I remember from the standard. > > > Right. And I clearly explained in my comment #14 why you were wrong. Getting > back to comment #11 so that we can run around in circles brings no improvement > to this conversation, and you will just keep on being wrong, even if you had > the standard in front of you, because your example in comment #11 does not > correspond to the code I'm doing. My comment #14 explains what is the correct > code for comparison.
We're indeed running in circles. Maybe you can find someone that can explain to you better on comp.lang.c. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45249
