------- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2010-08-22 12:12 ------- Subject: Re: LTO breaks C99 inline
On Sun, 22 Aug 2010, hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > How this function is different from GNU C > inline int f() > alone? If it is equivalent, is there some chance that C frontend would set the > flags same way? (I.e. not setting EXTERN flag on the function) It's equivalent - once the end of the translation unit is reached. But with C99 you can have the declaration with extern or without inline, coming *after* the definition, which is what causes it to be exported. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45152
