------- Comment #16 from jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-16 16:00
-------
(In reply to comment #15)
> Like
>
> Index: gimplify.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gimplify.c (revision 164333)
> +++ gimplify.c (working copy)
> @@ -2477,10 +2477,13 @@ gimplify_call_expr (tree *expr_p, gimple
> gimplify_modify_expr. */
> if (!want_value)
> {
> + gimple_stmt_iterator gsi;
> /* The CALL_EXPR in *EXPR_P is already in GIMPLE form, so all we
> have to do is replicate it as a GIMPLE_CALL tuple. */
> call = gimple_build_call_from_tree (*expr_p);
> gimplify_seq_add_stmt (pre_p, call);
> + gsi = gsi_last (*pre_p);
> + fold_stmt (&gsi);
> *expr_p = NULL_TREE;
> }
>
Will this also work also for GIMPLE_CALLs with a LHS or do I have to
add something like the above also elsewhere?
>
> but gimple_fold_obj_type_ref_known_binfo returns NULL.
>
cgraph_function_flags_ready needs to be added to the conjunction
(!node->analyzed && !node->in_other_partition) and then it is folded.
I'll prepare a patch tomorrow.
Thanks, Martin
--
jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot
|dot org |org
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2010-09-16 12:25:30 |2010-09-16 16:00:08
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45605
